Hence, watchman style policing basically deals with maintaining order and law. One example of watchman style is, if kids are out past curfew the officer may not intervene with them at all. Hence, the legalistic style uses little discretion but enforces the law by writing more tickets, making more arrests and, encouraging victims to sign complaints.
For example, with reference to the first example, police officers in a legalistic department would write them a citation or arrest them. Lastly, the Service style policing is normally found in the suburban police department where small amount of crimes relatively happen. Therefore, service style policing has similar characteristics as watchman style and legalistic style policing but, focuses mainly on service to the community and citizens.
For example, whereas legalistic style would make arrest they would not be able to do so. They would try to intervene in some way by taking them home or calling their parents. Hence, whether departmental or individual, policing style plays an important role in understanding police attitudes and behaviours. Highlighting the peace of watchman style policing includes the controlling of few officers that does ranking and filing excluding aggressive law enforcement.
Service style policing focuses mainly on service to the community and citizens but has similar characteristics as watchman style and legalistic style policing. References Peel, R.
Policing in the 21st Century Quotes by Lee P. Starting from 3 hours delivery. Sorry, copying is not allowed on our website. We will occasionally send you account related emails. This essay is not unique. Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper. Want us to write one just for you?
We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by professional essay writers. Get help with writing. Pssst… we can write an original essay just for you. A police officer in a watchman department typically has the most discretion. In contrast, legalistic style departments have one standard: strict enforcement of the law. This type of department produces large numbers of arrests and traffic citations.
Most calls for service are resolved in a formal manner in which an arrest or a formal complaint is made. The third type, the service style department, prioritizes all requests for assistance without differentiating between order maintenance or law enforcement functions.
Police officers in these departments are not likely to make an arrest unless the situation renders it absolutely necessary. If the community or department deems the juvenile curfew as important, police officers operating in a service style would not be as likely to make an arrest as officers from a legalistic department but would intervene in some way, perhaps by taking the youths home or calling their parents to pick them up. State police and state highway patrol agencies more closely follow a paramilitary structure than other police departments and are most likely to have a legalistic style.
These departments view themselves as law enforcers and require every officer to handle every situation in a similar manner. Suburban police departments usually follow service-oriented styles, since their role is defined by the community in which they serve.
Suburban communities want the police to maintain public order and intervene whenever possible but tend to prefer informal outcomes to arrests.
By their nature, rural and small-town police departments afford their officers the most discretion and are most likely to fit the watchman style. In these departments, police officers are asked to perform an array of nontraditional police functions and often have little outside assistance to complete them Weisheit, Falcone, and Wells While departmental policing styles do influence individual performance and behavior, police officers have their own unique policing styles.
These individual styles are based on predispositions that provide police officers with an array of responses to various situations. William Muir believed that officers developed distinctive styles and that their selection of an operational style was premised on whether officers possessed two specific attitudes. The first attitude, which Muir termed passion, pertained to whether officers recognized the need to use coercion and were willing to employ it to attain job-related goals and objectives.
The second attitude, perspective, involved the willingness of officers to empathize with the circumstances of citizens with whom officers interacted. Muir developed a typology based on these attitudes. The typology consists of four policing styles: professionals officers possessing both passion and perspective , enforcers officers possessing passion but not perspective , reciprocators officers possessing perspective but lacking passion , and avoiders officers who had neither passion nor perspective.
Some officers will be able to justify their use of force and will not feel guilt or remorse for their actions an integrated morality of coercion , while other officers may hesitate to use force and will be unable to justify its use even when necessary conflicted morality of coercion.
Police officers with a professional style will carefully evaluate each situation before taking actions and will use force only when necessary, using only the amount of force appropriate to the situation. These police officers view their roles as being both difficult and complex. The professional understands and accepts the limits of the police. Professionals tend to have high levels of job satisfaction.
These police officers have a higher likelihood of becoming frustrated with the limited amount of time they can be crime fighters. The reciprocator is similar to the professional in that these officers have a more tragic perspective. They are oriented to helping people in ways that will have a lasting effect. Unlike the professional, reciprocators have a conflicted morality of coercion. They are uncomfortable with using force as part of their law enforcement responsibilities.
Reciprocators tend to believe that every citizen has a good side and should be given second chances. These police officers are more likely to suffer from job dissatisfaction and burnout due to their frustration and disappointment.
The avoider style is the exact opposite of the professional style. Avoiders have a cynical perspective and a conflicted morality of coercion. Assuming that most social and crime-related problems are beyond their control, avoiders approach law enforcement as if they only want employment and minimally perform their duties. Since avoiders have little motivation to be police officers, they have a high level of job dissatisfaction.
Broderick believed that while some officers viewed law enforcement as their most important function, other officers viewed themselves as public servants.
Enforcers see their role as strictly performing police work and tend to become frustrated when required to perform non-crime fighting activities. Idealists place a high value on both due process and the need for social order.
It is common for idealists to become frustrated and dissatisfied. Optimists are oriented toward helping people but realize the limits of trying to enforce the law and can avoid becoming frustrated when their goals are not met.
0コメント